Or, to put it another way: security through obscurity is ok. as long as no one 
finds out, or goes looking for, public information, everything's hidden well 
enough.

Regards,
Charlie
602.420.4123

-----Original Message-----
From: Gnupg-users [mailto:gnupg-users-boun...@gnupg.org] On Behalf Of Rejo 
Zenger
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2014 12:14 PM
To: gnupg-users@gnupg.org
Subject: Re: Fwd: GNU hackers discover HACIENDA government surveillance and 
give us a way to fight back

++ 22/08/14 11:38 +0200 - Garreau, Alexandre:
>The difference in the relation we have with information is who does it
>concern: when it concerns everybody (like Science, information about 
>politics, events, Philosophy, Art, etc. what generally is what 
>Wikipedia contains, aka “encyclopedic informations”), it should be 
>shared among everyone, and not doing so is taking part in some kind of 
>oppression (like stopping people from sharing a software); when it 
>concerns only
[...]

That's an interesting point of view - or there is some misunderstanding on my 
end. Let's say the NSA does not only surveil all kinds of communications as it 
does right now, but it also publishes this information ("open data" in 
governmental speak), then there is no oppression according to you? 


--
Rejo Zenger
E r...@zenger.nl | P +31(0)639642738 | W https://rejo.zenger.nl T @rejozenger | 
J r...@zenger.nl
OpenPGP   1FBF 7B37 6537 68B1 2532  A4CB 0994 0946 21DB EFD4
XMPP OTR  271A 9186 AFBC 8124 18CF  4BE2 E000 E708 F811 5ACF
_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

Reply via email to