-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512
On Tuesday 9 December 2014 at 9:22:07 AM, in <mid:op.xqlga5dtehc...@hinterberger.hgb.at.apex>, Hugo Hinterberger wrote: > Hi, > It seems that you (MFPA) changed your signing practice > after I noted that I can't verify signatures created > with your key “1AF778E4”. I did not know that one could > sign a message with two keys in one signing block. Just use "local-user" more than once. If identifyinf specific subkeys, you need to follow the key-id with an exclamation mark (!). > I am wondering if there is a way to collapse the > verification result for a multi-key signature down to a > single “good” or “bad” value/result, because Enigmail > gave me some ambiguous message about your signatures. What I am applying is two signatures. It is perfectly possibly you can verify one and not the other. - -- Best regards MFPA mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net War is a matter of vital importance to the State. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQF8BAEBCgBmBQJUh6nwXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAw MDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwAAoJEGt8dM6zHyXwB8AIAJcuHgKcGD51HjOdtnV+ViHW XYs7Ypk9qPmGC/0bDmFnOpp/cCobygi4i/H0ojHOnM2kSFmu8id+gUKDsBhUNn0w Fg/ITw/lVE8ZaOxIXkuMReJ6WSpWcs8KMVUxfah5df6QHdHvC4+hLeAPDi7ZujcP ZyqYkipLX90eOLD6szhmjZdP5N95ju05riq6NqQUhb5yuNW93PhSWBscHXpSjCdh j87N2wsa4UW5/qL35jQ30Jt4QNZfZ3VECfVchNDjjMgKDvghfAXOKPkPk1/QKraQ gE4UfmCCgWgocFTsBFYWYi7/OeEnItZ12Ea9B5nxlNUvhCkA1frY+PahgMI/A3eI vgQBFgoAZgUCVIep/F8UgAAAAAAuAChpc3N1ZXItZnByQG5vdGF0aW9ucy5vcGVu cGdwLmZpZnRoaG9yc2VtYW4ubmV0MDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMDAw MDAwMDAwMDAwMDAwMAAKCRAXErxGGvd45C/0AQD/N8owcv/J7rCPMabq2FjdIXvJ BLeHP8nLrctA0YGKrwEAuBMOumfIN6dgDvid1NF11hFAv9vyCAJz3oUb2WlA8go= =HLH/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users