Am Fr 27.02.2015, 09:45:36 schrieb gnupgpacker: > German ct magazine has postulated in their last edition that our pgp > handling seems to be too difficult for mass usage, keyserver > infrastructure seems to be vulnerable for faked keys, published mail > addresses are collected from keyservers and so on...
Werner has replied to that (on gnupg...@gnupg.org and here): http://rem.eifzilla.de/archives/2015/02/24/re-die-schlssel-falle -- Crypto für alle: http://www.openpgp-schulungen.de/fuer/unterstuetzer/ http://userbase.kde.org/Concepts/OpenPGP_Help_Spread OpenPGP: 7D82 FB9F D25A 2CE4 5241 6C37 BF4B 8EEF 1A57 1DF5
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
