Am 01.03.2015 um 17:45 schrieb MFPA <2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net>:
>> and also gets rid of spam >> by requiring a proof of work to send something. > > Surely, "proof of work" is evidence of performing some otherwise > unnecessary CPU cycles. This wastes energy. In a system used by > billions of people, lots of energy. That "wasted energy" is a lot less than the energy we currently waste on spam, especially if you take into consideration the amount of human time wasted. The majority of the e-mail traffic is used up by spam. -- Jonathan _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
