I have no opinion one way or the other re: StartSSL, but there are those who do:
< https://danconnor.com/post/50f65364a0fd5fd1f7000001/avoid_startcom_startssl_like_the_plague_ > <https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=994033> < https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20140409/11442426859/shameful-security-startcom-charges-people-to-revoke-ssl-certs-vulnerable-to-heartbleed.shtml > etc. Avi ---- User:Avraham pub 3072D/F80E29F9 1/30/2009 Avi (Wikimedia-related key) <avi.w...@gmail.com > Primary key fingerprint: 167C 063F 7981 A1F6 71EC ABAA 0D62 B019 F80E 29F9 On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 7:47 PM, Mick Crane <mick.cr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 12 Mar 2015, at 23:21, Hugo Osvaldo Barrera <h...@barrera.io> wrote: > > > On 2015-03-11 17:38, Werner Koch wrote: > > On Wed, 11 Mar 2015 15:12, br...@minton.name said: > > > git.gnupg.org) don't use that certificate. Have you considered a wildcard > > certificate? I know this has been discussed before, e.g. at > > > Too expensive ;-). To stop all these complaints I will add a so called > > real certificate but first I need to move the tracker to another > > machine. > > > > Shalom-Salam, > > > Werner > > > No need for a wildcard one. Just get one free certificate for each > subdomain > > from StartSSL. > > > I think Werner can make his own authority and certificate ? > That sort of information stuff used to much more readily accessible on the > net, like how to run your own DNS. > For forgetful people is difficult to track things down now with so much > available. > > _______________________________________________ > Gnupg-users mailing list > Gnupg-users@gnupg.org > http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users > >
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users