On Tue 2015-04-28 11:36:34 -0400, Robert J. Hansen wrote: > I'm not objecting to the idea of GKD providing its own pinentry: > creating a gkd-pinentry sounds like a good idea.
OK, that's good! > I'm objecting to what I read (and possibly misread) as placing GKD hooks > into the *GnuPG-distributed* pinentry. > > I would suggest that in the future we talk about "pinentry" only for > GnuPG's pinentry, and "foo-pinentry" to denote a pinentry provided by > foo, so as to prevent future misunderstandings. :) Well, gnupg currently distributes four different pinentries: pinentry-gtk2 pinentry-qt4 pinentry-curses pinentry-tty :) I'm assuming that Neal is adding this hook to pinentry-gtk2, and not to the others, but i haven't checked. BTW: thanks, Neal! --dkg _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users