[Sent from my HTC, as it is not a secured device there are no cryptographic keys on this device, meaning this message is sent without an OpenPGP signature. In general you should *not* rely on any information sent over such an unsecure channel, if you find any information controversial or un-expected send a response and request a signed confirmation] On Jul 29, 2015 4:02 PM, "MFPA" <2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-gro...@riseup.net> wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA512 > > Hi > > > On Wednesday 29 July 2015 at 1:47:35 PM, in > <mid:55b8cb67....@sumptuouscapital.com>, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > > > > On 07/29/2015 02:41 PM, MFPA wrote: > >> That would be good: mail clients that applied a rule > >> to only use validated keys would otherwise deny > >> service when emailing somebody who is trying to keep > >> their key off the keyservers. > > > Are they really the target group for this proposal? > > The target group for an email address validation certificate on my key > would be people who wanted to email me.
You are still in control of that given that you can (i) opt not to click the validation link, so other users defer back to WoT, same as today (ii) elect not to give any ownertrust to the CA
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users