-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Hi
On Wednesday 29 July 2015 at 5:34:52 PM, in <mid:[email protected]>, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > note that this has the side effect of marking every > lsigned key+user id as valid (since i'm certifying it > with my own key). Would it work to keep a special key with downgraded ownertrust for making these local signatures, so that they didn't validate the keys? - -- Best regards MFPA <mailto:[email protected]> During an eruption - move away from the volcano - not towards it -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQF8BAEBCgBmBQJVuV1IXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRCM0FFN0VDQTlBOEM4QjMwMjZBNUEwRjU2 QjdDNzRDRUIzMUYyNUYwAAoJEGt8dM6zHyXwffMH/i7BmUyQ8RPi2TCwtOJ7OBht tSTjCGBbioT5I9akZO34s7p38f9wb8QgoJe58RlNEpSaAJ6kz/bClM9KeiqA6IVT oqs80wn60UjL9ZP3D60fhn/oMJQ+ZUIaDHLGkZhsgYRak+nlEGlUBBMx+XHsxI76 b/NG2IvkJmphz34m++Z8IYY8PEhyjgSRcWKxou+qJmFrZ6PYWH9tOWH+d/xM4kyi rc3IZYIVakPrM5mOCZrkjeIksbbgxAgCy6KUbNuY6ivfHAyvWUdTq/IzJJgNiaOD Xr4++N9xnZRY0GQcMSe6GWarI28CPfMkqJzx+C8Fo5cOtSF+FV4VCC10jw19mXyI vgQBFgoAZgUCVbldTl8UgAAAAAAuAChpc3N1ZXItZnByQG5vdGF0aW9ucy5vcGVu cGdwLmZpZnRoaG9yc2VtYW4ubmV0MzNBQ0VENEVFOTEzNEVFQkRFNkE4NTA2MTcx MkJDNDYxQUY3NzhFNAAKCRAXErxGGvd45L78AQCOY47wuYJoOtoXh1bfiLJxSii8 Pxo7YFLRyF4eToZWDwD/VMVW4yq96v2QGtzlc3TguWEE+5+ujENFYGPnHIINuA4= =mR/3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
