>> >> I know that. But i saw not really an advantage to using the gpg agent, >> except of the using of TTL’s for keys i want to add. >> What are your points to use the gpg-agent instead the ssh-agent? >> > > Using (or trying to setup) gpg-agent as a replacement for ssh-agent is > just based on one idea: if you deal with gpg-keys, have the "original" > application handle all key-related stuff, it was designed for doing so. > If nothing else interferes, less errors should occur and less attack > surface is presented. It merely is intuition, not science.
Make totally sense. I will try that out. Marko -- Marko Bauhardt marko.bauha...@mailbox.org Bitte schützen Sie meine und Ihre Privatsphäre, nutzen Sie PGP Please protect my and your privacy, use PGP Key ID: 53192101 Fingerprint: DC0F E851 82A3 72E3 7FE1 ACDB 970C FD47 5319 2101
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
