On 08/17/2016 04:24 PM, Bernhard Reiter wrote: > Am Dienstag, 16. August 2016 16:57:07 schrieb Robert J. Hansen: >>> Ah thanks, this was introduced with 2.1.13 and I tested the >>> behaviour on an earlier 2.1 version where it make a difference. >>> So it is a recommendation for GnuPG v <=2.0. >> >> Concur. I'll make the change shortly. > > Thanks. > To meanwhile spread the word, I have temporarily added the following news to > the wiki.gnupg.org > > == News > * 2016-08-16: Somebody uploaded the [[https://evil32.org|evil32]] pubkeys to > keyservers. It is time to remind people to set > the default {{{keyid-format long}}} in their {{{gpg.conf}}} to use 64bit
I'm not sure I like this, it avoids the actual issue of people using non-verified keys (and verification would be using fingerprint to begin with, although I might read it without the proper context in this email) -- ---------------------------- Kristian Fiskerstrand Blog: https://blog.sumptuouscapital.com Twitter: @krifisk ---------------------------- Public OpenPGP certificate at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3 ---------------------------- Aquila non capit muscas The eagle does not hunt flies
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users