Peter Lebbing: > On 08/12/16 21:42, Stephan Beck wrote: >> [...], so I don't see the real need for a forced coexistence of the two >> (or three) versions on Jessie. > > I did that because all the software in jessie that depends on GnuPG 1.4 > might not work with GnuPG 2.1. So by doing it like this, I'm not > breaking any packages that have the package "gnupg" in their dependency > tree. >
Yes, I understand, and it's great work! I just wanted to say that I, personally, don't see the need since I upgraded to a 2.1 only installation. Cheers Stephan
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users