Peter Lebbing:
> On 08/12/16 21:42, Stephan Beck wrote:
>> [...], so I don't see the real need for a forced coexistence of the two
>> (or three) versions on Jessie.
> 
> I did that because all the software in jessie that depends on GnuPG 1.4
> might not work with GnuPG 2.1. So by doing it like this, I'm not
> breaking any packages that have the package "gnupg" in their dependency
> tree.
> 

Yes, I understand, and it's great work! I just wanted to say that I,
personally, don't see the need since I upgraded to a 2.1 only installation.

Cheers

Stephan


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

Reply via email to