Good point. Note: You forgot to reply to list.
On 02/09/17 22:11, Lachlan Gunn wrote: > Le 2017-09-03 à 11:48, Mario Castelán Castro a écrit : >> I am well aware of that. Although deniable encryption is not a panacea >> it is an improvement. It gives less power to the correspondent to blackmail. > > I would also add that lots of servers will put a DKIM signature onto the > email, thus showing who sent the ciphertext to whom. Obviously this > isn't as secure as a personal digital signature, since anyone who can > get into your email account can send email in your name, but it does > mean that email nowdays is at least somewhat non-repudiable. -- Do not eat animals; respect them as you respect people. https://duckduckgo.com/?q=how+to+(become+OR+eat)+vegan
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
