-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 10/12/17 18:50, Robert J. Hansen wrote: >> The observation that one, some, many, or all people use a >> linguistic construct in an incorrect way do not change the fact >> that it is incorrect. > > It quite definitely does.
This is silly. I am flabbergasted at this assertion. > ... the *only* definition of correctness in English is found> in whether it conforms to everyday usage in the community in question. For someone who touts himself as a "languages geek extraordinaire," I am shocked that you'd claim this. I don't expect Germans to communicate in anything other than German. I appreciate that the main developer communicates in this forum in English, but I certainly don't feel he owes it to anyone. Servus, Daniel Villarreal http://www.youcanlinux.org youcanlinux at gmail.com PGP key 2F6E 0DC3 85E2 5EC0 DA03 3F5B F251 8938 A83E 7B49 https://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xF2518938A83E7B49 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEL24Nw4XiXsDaAz9b8lGJOKg+e0kFAlngBsAACgkQ8lGJOKg+ e0mlCAf9F9HSRx1Foz8kWNPA0B7hu3Zkt4yOtTy8q5l8h+VrBWsqcx7S9sMgGUj0 wXpWpAs048oTtOTo08lMt38XtmnB7JpAAVZjCD+EvsJXxoqSxaEmZzOT2t5ikF5g sPGAPozZQ+xO7k5ySl+v4BHMe6iZtgEQ/50G9k1Iyqid/sV69udJqaYUvQf9sZj9 C4xd9DCAqvZQ4ayOHuRoGe3D43Re+eH4eMwhs4usuaedqP3D4CmS8EoRpjaVRen0 SGB+RSICW7u7Bh9VphINmTDjRUwLj7UUtjIunQgAQmlkmmXrTMkt6vOH9fjFB9Tl 0F1vLzbUyDdcZJV/jYw9eLOqtO2z0A== =ulnO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users