On Mon, 15 Jan 2018 19:47:39 +0100, Peter Lebbing wrote: > On 15/01/18 17:39, Stefan Claas wrote: > > Maybe we need (a court) case were a PGP user requests the removal > > of his / her keys until the operators and code maintainers wake > > up? > > Wow, you're entertaining an interesting notion of what is "needed"! > > Let's hope most people will just let keyserver operators alone while > they offer their kind service for free to the world. > > What is "needed" if you must, is someone thinking of a way to > incorporate cryptographic validation into the whole gossip and what > not process. Not turning loose the lawyers on people offering a free > service. I can't believe what I'm hearing here. Just, wow.
How long do we have now those old fashioned key servers, and was there ever been made attempts by the software maintainers to modernize the code, like you are saying incorporating crypto validation? O.k. Werner invented WKD which solves those problems, if i'm not mistaken, but is it besides keybase.io widely deployed? The old pgp.com key server solved those problems also nicely, if i remember correctly. Regards Stefan -- https://www.behance.net/futagoza https://keybase.io/stefan_claas _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
