On 16/01/18 17:47, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > I'm somewhat interested in hearing how this scheme would work in the > case of a compromised private key. Mainly;
I was merely using the description of the basics of it as a means to show how it would be access control rather than DRM. All the thorny extra issues I never even seriously considered is part of why I also said "I'm not saying this is the way to go." > (iii) iff (ii)(a) and (ii)(b) differ; how would you handle a sync > conflict of said data? Sounds really, really difficult to solve. Perhaps impossible? Since I'm not advocating implementing this in the first case, I'm not spending many computation cycles on the issue either :-). It might be there is an imperfect but acceptable solution, though. The problem with that is again litigation: "What do you mean, you can't remove me? You have a removal feature! See you in court!" Cheers, Peter. -- I use the GNU Privacy Guard (GnuPG) in combination with Enigmail. You can send me encrypted mail if you want some privacy. My key is available at <http://digitalbrains.com/2012/openpgp-key-peter>
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
