Daniel Kahn Gillmor [2018-02-20 21:35:12-08] wrote: > Anyway, here's one concrete example (hinted at above) of a > programmatic gap that is much easier to achieve by mucking around with > the internal state rather than by the programmatic interface: > > * I want to introduce a new signing-capable subkey, and i want to > distribute it widely, but i don't want to start signing with it just > yet.
It seems to me that there is an easy gpg.conf solution:
default-key FINGERPRINT!
See the ! character which forces exactly that (sub)key for signing. Use
that option to select your old signing (sub)key.
--
/// Teemu Likonen - .-.. <https://keybase.io/tlikonen> //
// PGP: 4E10 55DC 84E9 DFF6 13D7 8557 719D 69D3 2453 9450 ///
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
