> Von: Werner Koch [mailto:w...@gnupg.org] > > On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 10:45, roman.fied...@ait.ac.at said: > > > No, this is a signed AND encrypted message. Can gpgv only be > > used to verify signatures on signed-only but not signed AND > > encrypted messages, maybe due to encrypt AFTER sign scheme? > > Correct. The signature is encrypted and thus it needs to be decrypted > before the signature can be checked. gpgv is only for checking > signature becuase it is designed to work without private keys.
Could you please update the documentation and the error messages from gpg1/gpg2/gpgv to be more helpful? Now I can also reproduce with gpg1/gpg2 verify on encrypted messages, gpg1 reports "unexpected data", which is a little more helpful than "unexpected error" from gpg2. Regards, Roman _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
