On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 11:53:02AM -0700, C.J. Collier wrote: > This all seemed to me to be something that GnuPG is designed to do and does > quite well. So I sent an email on Friday night to the sender of the letter > requesting specific issues that my provider did not comply with. This > morning I received a call from the DoL, and was able to successfully argue > for GnuPG's qualification as an electronic records notary public technology > provider for the State of Washington. > > In short, GnuPG can now be used to perform notarial acts > <http://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=42.45.140> in the State of > Washington!
Well done! Any idea how applicable your experience will be in other states? -- ... _._. ._ ._. . _._. ._. ___ .__ ._. . .__. ._ .. ._. Felix Finch: scarecrow repairman & wood chipper / fe...@crowfix.com GPG = E987 4493 C860 246C 3B1E 6477 7838 76E9 182E 8151 ITAR license #4933 I've found a solution to Fermat's Last Theorem but I see I've run out of room o _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users