On 03/07/2019 18:37, Stefan Claas via Gnupg-users wrote: > Why so upset? > > I think I am allowed here to post my opinion and I do no "force" > people.
You just said that if only you had the time and money, you would try to
take down the SKS network using a legal procedure. A procedure meant to
object to your data being available on the internet, while you clearly
don't have a problem with your data being available.
A year ago, you threatened to do precisely what has happened now: poison
Rob's OpenPGP key. You might even be the one that has done it, we can't
know.
That's not posting an opinion here. And it /is/ threatening to force
your way on other people.
This all is so bloody transparent that I don't see what your point is
yelling that the sky is green when clearly it's blue.
And apparently, I didn't check although it did ring a few bells, you
have in the past indicated you had wilfully fucked with other people's
OpenPGP keys to prove your point that it was possible. That's vandalism
in my book.
> EOD.
Neither of us gets to decide that for the other. BTW, you literally
asked a question ("Why so upset?").
Peter.
--
I use the GNU Privacy Guard (GnuPG) in combination with Enigmail.
You can send me encrypted mail if you want some privacy.
My key is available at <http://digitalbrains.com/2012/openpgp-key-peter>
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
