Creating the Key is the only thing that the normal User has to do, That is possible via a Menue Entry.
I don´t see the Problem.
Am 2019-10-11 um 21:49 schrieb Chris
Narkiewicz via Gnupg-users:
Thanks,On 09/10/2019 08:06, Tony Lane via Gnupg-users wrote:> It doesn't do that? Why would they choose to tightly couple TB withOpenPGP? If I have to maintain two key databases, that's a dealbreakerfor me.Dealing with GnuPG complexity is a deal breaker for ordinary users, preventing adoption. You need to look at it from product/business development perspective and it makes perfect sense that they want to ship their own UX. Also, they mention that the key management workflow is something they plan to address. Cheers, Chris _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
-- <pre> -========================== Jan-Peter Rühmann & Kuma =========================- Gubkower Str.7 [ Tel.: +49 38205 65484 ] jan-pe...@ruehmann.name 18195 Cammin / Prangendorf [ FAX: +49 38205 65212 ] https://www.ruehmann.name WhatsApp: 491621316054 [ Tel.: +49 38205 65215 ] Twitter: @JPRuehmann [ Mobil: +49 162 1316054 ] IT-Servicetechniker -=============================================================================- Die Verwendung der Daten zu Werbezwecken ist verboten. </pre>
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users