Which ccomplexity?

Creating the Key is the only thing that the normal User has to do, That is possible via a Menue Entry.
I don´t see the Problem.

Am 2019-10-11 um 21:49 schrieb Chris Narkiewicz via Gnupg-users:
On 09/10/2019 08:06, Tony Lane via Gnupg-users wrote:> It doesn't do
that? Why would they choose to tightly couple TB with
OpenPGP? If I have to maintain two key databases, that's a dealbreaker
for me.

Dealing with GnuPG complexity is a deal breaker for ordinary users,
preventing adoption. You need to look at it from product/business
development perspective and it makes perfect sense that they want to
ship their own UX.

Also, they mention that the key management workflow is something they
plan to address.

Cheers,
Chris

_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
Thanks,
-- 
<pre>
-========================== Jan-Peter Rühmann & Kuma =========================-
Gubkower Str.7             [ Tel.:  +49 38205 65484 ]   jan-pe...@ruehmann.name
18195 Cammin / Prangendorf [ FAX:   +49 38205 65212 ] https://www.ruehmann.name
WhatsApp: 491621316054     [ Tel.:  +49 38205 65215 ]
Twitter: @JPRuehmann       [ Mobil: +49 162 1316054 ]       IT-Servicetechniker
-=============================================================================-
           Die Verwendung der Daten zu Werbezwecken ist verboten.
</pre>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

Reply via email to