On Tue 2019-10-15 23:01:33 +0200, Werner Koch via Gnupg-users wrote: > On Tue, 15 Oct 2019 09:06, Bjarni Runar Einarsson said: > >> Would the GnuPG issue tracker be a good place to file "bug >> reports" against the spec, to work towards clarifications? > > That is okay for bug reports, but often it is more important to get the > opinions from more people than those who triage the bug reports. > > I thing gnupg-devel@ gnupg.org would be an appropriate place for > discussing such topics.
WKD is a useful spec, and an increasingly important part of the OpenPGP ecosystem. If we want general e-mail discussion about WKD concerns, i'd suggest using the open...@ietf.org mailing list, as it will reach implementers of more WKD clients than just gnupg-users. That said, e-mail discussion is not the same as a tracker that allows us to keep a list of currently-known issues and concerns. If https://dev.gnupg.org/ is not appropriate for that sort of issue tracking, perhaps we could set up an issue tracker on gitlab associated with the WKD spec? I'd be happy to set up such a tracker at (say) https://gitlab.com/openpgp-wg/web-key-directory/issues if folks are OK with it. Werner, does that sound OK to you? As usual for any IETF-related interoperability discussion, i'd expect any major issues to *also* go to the mailing list for visibility and robust archiving, but i think that having an actively-maintained, publicly-accessible issue tracker related to this important work would be concretely useful. --dkg
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users