Hi Stefan Thats not the approach PGP pursues. PGP was, is and should continue to be decentralized in the future. It was never really intended to validate identities in a wide circle, but to secure communication, and - im parts - to ensure the integrity of software.
The so-called WOT has proven to me in the field of PGP and does not really need central instances Am 07.12.19 um 21:11 schrieb Stefan Claas: > Yes, but the is not an OpenPGP 'fault' IHMO, it is caused by users and > the OpenPGP community in general, not accepting CAs and still relying > on the classical WoT. > > Maybe we should ask ourselves why we not have more (free) CAs for > the OpenPGP ecosystem (wish we had more like Governikus ...) regards Juergen
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
