On Fri 29/May/2020 12:29:48 +0200 Stefan Claas wrote: > Binarus wrote: >> On 28.05.2020 23:21, Stefan Claas wrote: >>> >>> while it is not my business, I do not understand why you have to >>> take care about the Thunderbird issue, as a users and not the >>> Aufsichtsbehörde ... If for example you have a job at the >>> Aufsichtsbehörde then ok, like I said, I would contact gnupg.com and >>> ask them if GnuPG Desktop (A Windows app) fits for your working >>> environment and in case not what they would suggest, because the >>> Aufsichtsbehörde should have IMHO funds to issue a professional >>> licensed working solution for their employees. >>> >>> In case you only have to deal as a gpg4win user with the >>> Aufsichtsbehörde via email, then I don't understand how would they >>> detect if you would not comply by using later the new Thunderbird, >>> without BSI approval. >> >> This is not my field, but I believe that (besides authorities) there >> are companies or other institutions which *must* use certified >> encryption solutions. Some ideas: > > [...] > > Yes, understand. But then if those institutions have no funds or > are not willing to invested in their IT security infrastructure > then they may ask the BSI how to proceed. Maybe the BSI has funds > to let gnupg.com develope a custom Windows solution for them. > > The other option would be that the OP and others continue using > their current Thunderbird/Enigmail/gpg4win setup.
Any chance that the BSI will approve the RNP library that Thunderbird is going to use? Best Ale -- _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users