> On 2020-06-30 12:26, Ralph Seichter via Gnupg-users wrote:
* Fourhundred Thecat:
I am basing my judgment on universal principles, that apply not only
to gpg or other software, but design of any systems in general.
Universal principles, oh my. In other words, you don't know nearly
enough about the finer points of GnuPG design goals, don't know much
about the challenges of evolutionary software design, and thus don't
know too well what you are talking about, universally speaking.
Show us a body of your work which proves you have the necessary skills
to critique the GnuPG authors' work. Until you do, your "judgment" is
moot.
An idea should be considered on its own merit. You should counter my
criticism with facts, instead of attacking me personally.
I stand behind my statement, that it is a sign of bad design, when gpg
does not work on a read-only filesystem.
You can either reply with counterargument, or ignore my messages in this
thread.
Cheers,
_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
