I understand it can be frustrating, especially if nobody has a deciding
vote or Vito power or moderator power. Someone should have have veto
power and anybody with other ideas can always fork and do his own thing.
That way it may probably work. A tyrant can stay on course and others
fork and be their own tyrant and are free to produce something better.
The moderators on this list (I do not know who they are) have been
tyrannical excluding some of my posts; I am not bitter or resentful. I
have to live up to standard and my posts have to be kind and gentle so
as not to burden those trying to help me for free; and amenable to
support by helping whoever is helping me. If there was no tyrant I could
have caused nuisance. Documentation needs a tyrant too.
On 7/26/2020 12:01 PM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
How about collective and cooperative effort in a wiki, or cloud funding
pledges or donations? Those who contribute (money or effort) get
privilege of some kind.
I am very pessimistic about the idea of collective effort. What
experience has taught me from working on the FAQ is that a small number
of people with extreme ideas speak up the loudest, and the vast majority
of users who are calm and reasonable speak up barely at all.
_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
