Robert J. Hansen wrote: > > It is true the attacks were what brought it down, but the amount of effort > > was not a "sustained > > attack" by any measure. The invested resources are somewhere around "couple > > hours and $0.00". > > I'm not sure that's true.
[...] I think it does not matter. Professional businesses and their customers can use the mentioned Mailvelope key server, to protect their keys or use for anonymity purposes Hagrid, in combination with sequoia pgp, while the geeks can use WKD. The only thing SKS, so it seems, is currently good for is decentralized file sharing or for chat purposes, when using SKS chat software. Regards Stefan _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users