On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 12:10 AM Ayoub Misherghi <ayou...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 1/16/2021 3:18 AM, Stefan Claas wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 11:57 AM Stefan Claas > <spam.trap.mailing.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 11:34 AM Ayoub Misherghi via Gnupg-users > <gnupg-users@gnupg.org> wrote: > > The intention is to sign and encrypt "data.file" producing a detached > signature file. > > > a@b:c$ gpg -s -e -b -r Mike data.file > > gpg: conflicting commands > > > Why is there a conflict? I do not want to produce an attached signature. > > You use -s and -b, try 'gpg -a -b -e file' > > You can shorten this like: 'gpg -aber Mike data.file' (cool German > word 'aber' :-) > > Regards > Stefan > > gpg -aber data.file > > produced "data.file.asc" and no "data.file.sig" > > > Danke,
Gern geschehen (you're welcome)! Try to omit the 'a' and see if you then get the .sig file. (I am a bit out of the loop regarding gpg) Regards Stefan _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
