On Sun, Jan 2, 2022 at 11:01 PM Ángel <an...@pgp.16bits.net> wrote: > You could use a wrapper which calls gpg twice, while the user only > calls your wrapper (as if it is gpg) once. > Thank you, I think that sounds like the best solution I've come across so far! =)
> However, I would like to question your need for requiring two gpg keys. > How are they two gpg going to be more secure? Usually, if someone was > able to steal one key, they could steal the second one as well as the > same time, and you could simply require a different second key, or > tweak the key parameters to get an higher level, if that's what you > want to achieve from the double encryption. > False assumption here =) One key is on me at all times, and also on a (physically and OS-wise) locked air-gapped machine. The other one is in a safe. So I question the assumption that "if someone was able to steal one key, they could steal the second as well" - considering that at least one of them goes with me wherever I go, including work and vacation. (The safe e.g. doesn't^^) -- Med vennlig hilsen/Kind regards, Christian Chavez Phone/Tlf: +47 922 22 603
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
