On Mittwoch, 24. Januar 2024 22:05:53 CET Leo Coogan via Gnupg-users wrote: > It looks like there's only that non-functioning signing subkey. Huh. Do > I need to create a new signing subkey?
Copy the content of ~/.gnupg/private-keys-v1.d from your fedora machine to your nixox machine (after making a backup) to restore the missing secret key. Regards, Ingo > On 1/24/24 12:37, Werner Koch wrote: > > On Tue, 23 Jan 2024 12:38, Leo Coogan said: > >> sec# ed25519 2023-03-03 [SC] [expires: 2025-03-02] > >> > >> C0156FFBE02B4E03F7792EB53D7F617CDE5C9A9B > >> Keygrip = 38953FFD2BD558606473A90A6EDD5B26F03FA3CB > > > > You don't have a signing key. Ther primary key has been taken offline > > ('#') and can thus not be used for signing. > > > >> ssb cv25519 2023-03-03 [E] [expires: 2025-03-02] > >> > >> 143454E3276F11C51D01B35363D14EA6FDB00D9F > >> Keygrip = 02EE4AA6089E9DEF7792F548C01FFD8C05F1EC21 > > > > The subkey is not capable of signing (by usage flags and algorithm). > > > > Did you had another signing subkey and that one expired? > > Add > > > > --list-options show-unusable-subkeys > > > > to the listing command to check. > > > > > > Salam-Shalom, > > > > Werner > > _______________________________________________ > Gnupg-users mailing list > Gnupg-users@gnupg.org > https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users