"Robert J. Hansen via Gnupg-users" <[email protected]> writes:
>> My ultimate goal is to route emails using gpg's fingerprinting. This is >> the first step toward that goal. That is all. > > Lua doesn't have GPGME bindings, so you'll likely have to do this the > error-prone way: fire up GnuPG and verify the signature, after hooking > up --status-fd to a file descriptor of your choice. _Do not_ parse the > normal console output: only the status-fd output should be used. > > When verifying a message with gpg --verify, you'll see a message > stanza like: > > [GNUPG:] KEY_CONSIDERED CC11BE7CBBED77B120F37B011DCBDC01B44427C7 0 > [GNUPG:] SIG_ID qtBYYa4lfH60IDd2oOz06S6QBjc 2026-01-08 1767855159 > [GNUPG:] GOODSIG 1DCBDC01B44427C7 Robert J. Hansen <[email protected]> > > The first, KEY_CONSIDERED, gives you the full fingerprint. If you then > see GOODSIG the message has passed its signature verification and then > you can have Lua do what you want with the message. Hellow Robert, Sorry for the late reply. After trying for a while to implement GPG-fingerprint in Postfix, i finally succeeded [1]. My next challenge is to build a DKIM signing strategy using OpenDKIM based on these results. Please give my regards to Werner instead. I've been reading his additional letters in depth and working on them. Stay healthy always. Thank you so much! INDEED... Sincerely, Byunghee [1] https://gitlab.com/soyeomul/Gnus/-/raw/8c24b7fa93c608203b86c6069a7fd18051b72cf3/TSG/filter/result.txt -- ^고맙습니다 _布德天下_ 감사합니다_^))//
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
