On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 1:15 PM, Onkar Shinde <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 2:38 AM, Aanjhan R <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 9:59 PM, Onkar Shinde <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I am working on converting SF.net exported bug data to LP.net required >>> format [1]. For this I am writing a XSL for transformation of data. >>> Currently I am planning to only migrate bugs and feature requests in >>> 'Open' state. The bugs/feature requests in 'Pending' state (fix for >>> which is already in git master) will not be migrated. Also I am >>> planning to get a quick 1.3.6 release soon to get the word out that we >>> are moving to LP and that development is active again. >> >> I really dont see why we must leave out the Pending and Closed bugs. >> Especially when there are only 38 bugs in total reported from 2003. >> Very stable software I believe ;) >> >> And wrt feature requests, I think some feature requests reported some >> bugs. I am not sure which ones. But I am not able to understand what >> is the problem in getting all imported. Is there any issue? > > There is no problem with importing all data. The question is do we > really need closed bugs/RFE data. I can understand about pending but > with a release even they will become closed soon.
We don't have to import closed issues because they are going to stay in the SF site for historical reasons, correct? I believe ChangeLog also points to SF bug numbers. So it may be better to leave closed/pending issues at SF.net and only port open issues to LP. BTW, Onkar - so you're writing a script to convert the data? Perhaps you should consider releasing it for other's benefit too. -srid _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~gnusim8085-devel Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~gnusim8085-devel More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
