one clarification, to build libnspr4-0d in debian you use the source
package:
stable/testing:
xulrunner
unstable:
nspr
Thanks,
-Tim
Tim Spriggs wrote:
> Hi devel,
>
> Question: should we use libnspr4 or libnspr4-0d ?
>
> if we are to use libnspr4-0d, should we change the dependency of sunwcsl?
> if we are to use libnspr4, how do we go about building the newest
> version? (seems like we want libnspr4-0d)
>
> Of note, searching for libnspr4 in debian packages yields that libnspr4
> was last available in oldstable. libnspr4-0d seems to be the newer
> alternative.
>
>
> http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=libnspr4&searchon=names&subword=1&version=all&release=all
>
> Background:
>
> I'm attempting to rebuild quite a few packages but a lot come down
> to needing a working java implementation. This comes down to needing
> libnspr4 or libnspr4-0d depending on where you are coming from. I can
> `apt-get source nspr` and build the packages just fine but nspr builds
> libnspr4-0d. According to the ubuntu website:
>
> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/1.5.dfsg+1.5.0.3-0ubuntu3
>
> the firefox source package builds libnspr4. `apt-get source firefox`
> gets firefox-2.0.0.6 and this source package knows nothing about
> creating libnspr4.
>
> Thanks,
> -Tim
> _______________________________________________
> gnusol-devel mailing list
> gnusol-devel@lists.sonic.net
> http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/gnusol-devel
>
_______________________________________________
gnusol-devel mailing list
gnusol-devel@lists.sonic.net
http://lists.sonic.net/mailman/listinfo/gnusol-devel
