Ooops! Two kind subscribers to the gnuspeech list (Andras Kadinger
and Jason White) have pointed out my silly error in claiming the
article below was about the danger of using C++ for GPL software.
The article is, as they pointed out, about the dangers of using C#.
Talk about seeing what you expect. I don't know how I could've made
that mistake, other than *really* poor eyesight, and too much haste.
I apologise.
david
----
On Jun 30, 2009, at 7:59 AM, David Hill wrote:
Hi Xianghang Liu,
On Jun 25, 2009, at 6:21 PM, xianghang liu wrote:
I am a c++ developer on speech processing and pattern recognition
and a big fan of opensource development. I am very interested in
this project and wondering if I could contribute to this software
as a developer? If so, I think I could help with fixing bugs and
implementing new features by sending patches.
You may be interested -- in view of the fact you are a C++
developer *and* interested in open source -- to check out the
following. It indicates why C++ may not be the best vehicle for
GPL software.
http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/opensource/?p=716&tag=nl.e011
I'll be interested in your view.
All good wishes.
david
--------
David Hill
[email protected]
http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnuspeech
--------
Simplicity, patience, compassion. These three are your greatest
treasures (Tao Te Ching #67)
---------
_______________________________________________
gnuspeech-contact mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnuspeech-contact
_______________________________________________
gnuspeech-contact mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnuspeech-contact
