Hi! Am Montag, den 04.04.2011, 19:21 -0500 schrieb Paul Tyson: > A lot of docbook-based > pages are plain-looking, but they can be dressed up quite a bit with > custom stylesheets. Nevertheless there are limits, and it is > difficult > to have total layout control.
Due to being xml docbook can be easily converted to other systems like tex. So aesthetics shouldn't be a problem. Am Montag, den 04.04.2011, 18:09 -0700 schrieb David Hill: > If I were producing mathematical text books I probably would have to > use TeX I wouldn't consider tex inappropriate for documentation but I argued in favour of docbook because it's easier to process (different output formats, etc.). Am Montag, den 04.04.2011, 18:09 -0700 schrieb David Hill: > Your feedback and suggestions are much appreciated, but I haven't seen > anything to change my view Probably it depends on your way of life. By using markup-based things all the time maybe I've just lost my sense for doing it any other way. Regards, Tobias
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ gnuspeech-contact mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnuspeech-contact
