--- Nicola Pero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > even if we get "real framework" support under > GNU/Linux, I would still > keep the core libraries as libraries on GNU/Linux,
this seems unlikely to happen without some sort of divine intervention. why not have them use 'native-library.make'? > because the "real > framework" support wouldn't necessarily work on all > past/future machines, > will depend on linker support etc. we should be able to autoconf this.. i should be able to come up with ld.so/ld/binutils macros to detect "real" frameworks and be able to set hacky frameworks or libraries as 'native-libraries' (instead of being platform based)... though base/gui are kindof weird with the header dir name and the library name being different... and other makefiles would need to start using $(FND_LIBS) $(GUI_LIBS) instead of -lgnustep-gui and -lgnustep-base when compiling to be usable when base/gui as frameworks was enabled... also ADDITIONAL_NATIVE_LIBS is really helpful wrt this and seems to have been unused in the things using native-libraries i've looked at (instead using ifeq's). anyhow should mention i have base and gui hacked here as native-libraries using real frameworks, but no real improvements to make yet though... matt __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
