Richard Frith-Macdonald wrote: > On 2005-05-10 01:07:00 +0100 Sheldon Gill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> * Remove PathHandling mode >> >> I'm quite concerned about PathHandling mode and want to remove it. I >> don't think it's necessary and adds more confusion and complexity. > > > As you know, we had much discussion about path handling, and there was > definitely no consensus ... so the current code is a compromise allowing > the various viewpoints to be more or less satisfied, and switching of > modes during runtime was purely for testing that. I think the aim is to > move to the 'do the right thing' mode once people are generally happy > (though perhaps mode control on process startup using an environment > variable will be supported). >
Indeed, please don't remove this yet. We (or rather I) haven't had time to change our code to use/test this yet. If there is a pressing reason that we need to decide on one or the other I can try to juggle priorities but that could still mean a few weeks from now. Cheers, David _______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
