Citát Nicolas Roard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Le 15 juin 05 ŕ 07:38, Stefan Urbanek a écrit : > > > Citát Gregory John Casamento <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > >> I only have one comment. The object doens't have to be a view. > >> It can be > >> any > >> object at all. So it's possible to just use a normal step talk > >> object > >> instead > >> of making StepTalkView. :) > > I know, I know :-) > > I was going to create a non-view object as well, but in fact having a > view is quite > nice after playing with it -- you could even create a panel (hidden > by default) > just to group them as you want... I also have other ideas, we'll see. > Well anyway I'll add a non-view object too for the next version, it's > not exactly hard > to do and it could be useful too :-) > > >> > >> We can discuss this later. > >> > >> > > > > I add that if you can make non-appkit object that would be included > > in an > > application, then I can add it to the StepTalk.framework. Therefore > > there would > > be no need for other library to link. The Gorm part is, of course, > > up to Greg. > > Well, it's easy to make a non-appkit object, but as I'd still want a > view anyway, > .. hmm.. I need to try, perhaps just defining the view in the > palette will be enough > after all, you're right. >
Is not what you want a kind of a diagram editor instead of a panel + view? Stefan Urbanek -- http://stefan.agentfarms.net First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. - Mahatma Gandhi _______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev