> > This makes upgrades a bit cumbersome as you have to upgrade everything, > > but well that's why we're making a major release I suppose. ;-) > > > > Well, I can revert the make part of the patch. It shouldn't be a > problem to have lobjc linked multiple times.
My personal suggestion would be to leave the change in, but add a clear explanation (that you need to recompile everything) in the release notes. Eg, taking us (Brainstorm/Opera Telecom) as an example, ordinately rebuilding all software on our live systems when we do our next upgrade should not be too much of a problem ... the important thing is that we know we have to do it! :-) I'm happy with any other solution (including reverting the make part of the patch), I don't think it is particularly important -- the most important thing is having a clear understanding of what is needed to upgrade without problems, and communicating it to users. Thanks _______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
