On Mer 26 octobre 2005 15:29, Richard Frith-Macdonald wrote: > On 2005-10-26 12:13:41 +0100 Dennis Leeuw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Here my question is also, is Windows a 1.0 goal or should it be >> post-1.0? > > I don't think so ... my feeling is that it would be a lot of work to get > to > the level of polish needed for a 1.0 release ... so unless we are setting > this 1.0 release target quite a long time away, I think it's impractical > to > include windows as part of the 1.0 gui release. > > I suggested three targets as general medium term project aims (a general > roadmap if you like), in the order that's my best guess as to priority for > the purposes of popularising GNUstep. I think we should concentrate on > the > first, but keep the others in mind. > > So, to get back to the 1.0 release idea ... > Highest priority ... fixing bugs that annoy people when they are using the > gui (I'm sure other people use different apps and have different > annoyances) > ... I view that as essential for a release ... but it doesn't mean we > shouldn't be improving documentation and testsuite and adding things like > Camaeleon too. I agree. For the 1.0 release, what do you think about an "OpenStep-compliant release" ? - This is the first goal of GNUstep. - There is already some bugs to fix for "OpenStep-compliants" classes. - There is already documentation for "OpenStep-compliants" classes. I think developpers can only target on it for the 1.0. 1.2 could be Windows / OpenStep + bug fix About Cocoa ( the Cocoa in MacOS 10.1 for example ) could be a 2.0 target. Can we create a GNUstepAppleExtentions in a separate framework for it ? Fabien _______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
