Quoting Serg Stoyan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Monday 24 October 2005 21:40, Sašo Kiselkov wrote: > > Quoting Adrian Robert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > I strongly encourage you to think about working on Project Center. > > > Much of the grunt work that you'll have to redo is already done, it has > > > a nice clean interface so far, with plenty of scope for extension, and > > > it's design is fundamentally familiar to Apple developers, so more > > > widespread adoption is likely. If you still want to explore making > > > your own IDE for a while, please at least consider integrating some of > > > your code into ProjectCenter at some point. > > > > > > thanks, > > > Adrian > > > > I know that extending ProjectCenter might be a nice and great way to reuse > > it's code, but personally I'd like to redesign some of it's aspects from > > grounds up and integrating those changes in PC would be basically redoing > > much of it, introducing new bugs and a lot of headche than if I did it from > > scratch. > > > > As for the editor: having interfaces to various user-configurable editors > > is great, but it would be ok to have a usable one in the base package as > > well... Just have something, extensions can be added later. > > All you mentioned before has already implemented in ProjectCenter or planned > to be implemented. You can see in Documentaion/TODO file. > > I know I have to post new ProjectCenter development plans and current state. > In short, now I've almost finished redesign bunle management (on-deman > loading of bundles). I come to this decision after I started to work on > editor. Next week I'll be offline(business trip). After that I plan to commit > changes to UNSTABLE_0_5 branch. Do you still have no time to see what the > ProjectCenter is now? > > If you have working fast editor with features toy mentioned before I'll be > glad to redesign ProjectCenter (if it would be sane) and integrate it. > > > That's my opinion. > > -- > Serg Stoyan
The code editor is rather fast (I know, I have a slow computer) and quite well separated, basically just two classes: SourceEditorDocument and EditorTextView. There is currently no support for code coloring, however, which is why it's _just_ two classes. After I add support for that, it will be of course more. As for work on PC: I'm sorry, but currently I want to continue PM. I plan to get into a releasable 0.1 state within a week. 0.1 in my terms means: most of it is implemented, though some bits here and there still remain, but what is implemented should be already stable and not crash <- of course this is often just a fantasy :-) But in order to make it mostly true, before releasing an app, I reserve a day or two and "tease" it around - while running in a debugger, I do stuff lots and lots of times repeatedly, do unexpected stuff, do nonsence, and in general "try hard to crash it". :-) I learned this at work, where thanks to that my apps don't segfault and throw out unexpected exceptions anymore. Also following the KISS rule (Keep It Simple, Stupid!) helps a lot. -- Saso _______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev