On 17 Nov 2005, at 01:38, Gregory John Casamento wrote:
Jesse,
--- Jesse Ross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I wanted to take the opportunity now, rather than later, to ask
if anyone
has any suggestions they would like to make regarding the name of
the
application.
What about AppDesigner?
Considering some of the scripting functionality that can be added
to an
interface now via Nicolas's StepTalk palette, it seems to me that
Gorm can
be used for much more now that just designing/building interfaces.
Gorm could always be used for more than this. :) The StepTalk
palette really
just takes it one step further and allows you to do the coding in
Gorm itself.
I, however, wouldn't want to name it based on abilities given to
it by a
palette which does not come with it by default.
I agree ... but I think it would be nice if such palettes *did* come
with Gorm by default.
Certainly it would be nice to have some sort of scripting and
database palettes included (even if only very simple ones) ... it
would help to differentiate Gorm from the interface generation tools
out there, and show just how/why it is a superior technology.
As for the name change ... I'm obviously biased, having picked it in
the first place, but I see no reason to change it and don't think any
name will please everyone.
_______________________________________________
Gnustep-dev mailing list
Gnustep-dev@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev