On Sam 26 novembre 2005 9:16, Richard Frith-Macdonald wrote: > > On 26 Nov 2005, at 06:05, Gregory John Casamento wrote: > >> Here is the Roadmap: >> >> http://mediawiki.gnustep.org/index.php/Roadmap >> >> If you are a maintainer, please make any changes for your section >> that you deem >> appropriate. > > Rather than changing anything, I'd like to query some things because > things on that page differ from my impressions of what's been > discussed on the mailing list, so I guess I'm missing out on stuff. > > GNUstep 1.0 > > 1. it says current base/make/back ... but what about ms-windows > support ... I'm guessing we want base/make/back fixes/improvements > for windows as it's not nearly such a good state as unix-style > systems. I'm not sure this is a 1.1 issue rather than 1.0 > This also ignores the fact that window manager interaction (focus in > particular) is undoubtedly the biggest problem with current apps, and > is a backend issue at least as much as a gui issue.
I think we should separated base/make/back. back on MS-Window is not for 1.0. base/make is probably ok ? > 2. gui seems wildly ambitious (complete coding on all existing > classes) . I agree. I think an OpenStep classes are enough if you want to release at the first quarter of 2006. I started to write/improve documentation for OpenStep Gui classes/method and there is a lot of work to do ( doc / some fixes ) >The 'fix major bugs' is obviously required, but we should decide on >what those bugs are I agree. We should also add a "1.0" Status into Tasks / bugs at savannah. What about documentation requirement ? I think it a must to attracked developpers. Fabien _______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
