Hello, On Saturday, January 21, 2006, at 03:47 PM, Fred Kiefer wrote:
I am a bit puzzled by this fast transission over to SVN. Looks like everybody wants to take place, or at least does not oppose it. Still we should make sure that now that we doing it, it does not interrupt the GNUstep development to much. For this I would like to see a transission periode, where the offical GNUstep code is still in CVS, but there is the same code in SVN to play with. Every GNUstep developer should do a few test updates during that time and we do the actual move, when we all feel comfortable with SVN. (I know I should have been practising myself already, but I didn't)
Untrue! I would prefer keeping CVS and don't bother about CVS. However I find such a transition period dangerous and difficult to manage, so a "instantaneous" switch is the best thing imho. A CVS mirror out of the SVN should be created at the same time so anonymous check-out can continue "as usual".
Have fun, R _______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
