> Well, maybe was the phrasing slightly suboptimal, but not the message > behind it ... ;-) Besides, we don't have a desktop (yet) and never > will because some project members don't want GNUstep to become a > desktop in the first place. This is legitimate, but I am convinced > this has negative impacts on the "progress" of the entire project.
Just in case you're referring to me, I do want a GNUstep desktop :-) I don't personally use a desktop myself (unless you call a barebone WindowMaker + xterm a 'desktop'), but a complete GNUstep desktop that provides a free implementation of a NeXTstep/Apple Mac OS X type desktop is/would be a fantastic thing to have! ;-) Thanks _______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
