--- Richard Frith-Macdonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 27 Dec 2006, at 15:33, Matt Rice wrote: > > > <bug-13916.diff> > > > > https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?13916 > > > > mainly wondering about theming, we could use the > normal white > > background and just use the > disabledControlTextColor > > or hard code the lightGray color (i'd prefer not > to for themeing) > > or add another named color (extension > disabledControlColor or > > disabledTextFieldColor something) > > or other comments on the patch... > > <bug-13916.diff> > > I would have thought that a disabled > controlBackgroundColor be the > correct color to use for the background of a > disabled text field ... > as if the 'paper' of the field was no longer there.
this makes sense to me... > > Using disabledControltextColor would presumably be > very bad ... as it > would mean you draw background and text with the > same color, and make > the text unreadable. > hmm, i don't see that, controlBackgroundColor is lightGray and disabledControlTextColor is darkGray and it seems readable to me (so in fact its no change from my patch except using the named color) > Of course, the idea of disabled text fields being > equivalent to the > paper being taken away (so there is nothing to draw > on) may be > unintuitive to others ... but it does has the > practical advantage of > not needing a new system color. > I hadn't thought of it this way, thanks __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
