Helge Hess <helge.hess <at> opengroupware.org> writes: > On Mar 21, 2007, at 17:52, Xavier Glattard wrote: > > Why the hell should libobjc be build as a dll ???? > > Don't know whether this was really a joke > > Anyways, its *very* important that libobjc is built as a DLL if you > build any other ObjC library/framework/bundle as a shared object. > Otherwise you end up with multiple ObjC runtimes in a single > application! This has cost me a LOT of time in the past because its > an easy to make mistake.
Yes, this was not really a joke :-\ An other stupid question : why dont link _only_ gnustep-base to a static libobjc ? So you would not had multiple objc runtime ! Hum... i bet you can't ;-) I read many things about undefined symbols that prevent to build dll... Is that the problem ? Thanks for your patience :-) Xavier _______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
