On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 4:46 PM, Nicola Pero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I think you missed the point i was actually trying to make, the point > > was that my makefile had been in GNUstep cvs and working for a long time, > > and then the case of the flag changed, and my subproject then began lacking > > resources. > > Ahm - thanks, I see what you mean now :-) > > The issue is related, but slightly different. Your GNUmakefile always had > xxx_HAS_RESOURCE_BUNDLE=yes, until David changed it to YES on 2008-03-06. ;-) > > gnustep-make has always accepted "yes" for the xxx_HAS_RESOURCE_BUNDLE flag, > since its first introduction in 2002. :-) > > But I suspect David was confused by the fact that xxx_NEEDS_GUI (a new flag) > requires "YES" instead of "yes" - which actually does sound like a bad > idea (since it's inconsistent with everything else!) and might be worth > fixing before the release! ;-) > > So I'll fix the new xxx_NEEDS_GUI flag to accept "yes" instead of "YES", like > everything else. Well, maybe I'll have it accept both "yes" and "YES" for > now. >
This is good to hear, i was worried we had gotten into a situation where certain releases only accepted YES, and others only accepted yes, so it was impossible to be compatible with all versions of gnustep-make. _______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
