Graham J. Lee wrote: > Presumably, distributing binaries linked against earlier, pre-LGPLv3 GNUstep > libraries is acceptable too (whether or not anyone likes the idea); I guess > the licence change wasn't propagated back through the SCM history to > retroactively apply to earlier revisions of GNUstep.
Yes, that's another option, though not a very desirable one. Even if the license change was propagated back, earlier versions of GNUstep were already released under LGPLv2.1, and so the old license can still be used. Hubert _______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
