Indeed. I was not advocating for it's removal, just curious how it was used since the pswrap program is all but useless for our purposes since the DGS/DPS backend was abandoned.
While we're on the subject... does anyone think that a program that does translation of PSW to calls to PS/DPS functions in gui would be worthwhile? The name "gswrap" springs to mind. ;) Previously I was thinking that there weren't that many programs which might need this, but this discussion has awakened that dusty corner of my mind. Gregory Casamento -- Principal Consultant - OLC, Inc # GNUstep Chief Maintainer ----- Original Message ---- From: Nicola Pero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Gregory John Casamento <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: gnustep-dev@gnu.org Sent: Tuesday, August 5, 2008 7:11:18 PM Subject: Re: Removing pswrap support from gnustep-make Not sure but anyway there's no hurry to remove the code - it does no harm. :-) Thanks -----Original Message----- From: "Gregory John Casamento" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, 5 August, 2008 22:36 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], gnustep-dev@gnu.org Subject: Re: Removing pswrap support from gnustep-make I'm interested in how it would be used since pswrap makes some pretty cryptic calls to DPS. Everytime I've ever had to translate a psw I've had to do so by hand into our PS/DPS calls. Later, GC Gregory Casamento -- Principal Consultant - OLC, Inc # GNUstep Chief Maintainer ----- Original Message ---- From: Nicola Pero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: gnustep-dev@gnu.org Sent: Monday, August 4, 2008 1:41:33 PM Subject: RE: Removing pswrap support from gnustep-make FYI: I was contacted by a (potential) user, so we'll keep .psw file support. :-) Thanks -----Original Message----- From: "Nicola Pero" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, 23 July, 2008 10:26 To: "Discuss-gnustep GNUstep" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Removing pswrap support from gnustep-make gnustep-make still supports .psw files, but I wonder if anyone is using them. I'd like to remove stuff that nobody is using. Do you know of anyone using pswrap and .psw files ? I don't even know how to test changes to the pswrap rules since I can't find a usable pswrap for GNU/Linux. :-/ I'll happily keep the code if there is even a single active user, or some reasonable probability that there is an active user somewhere ... otherwise we'll remove it and simplify gnustep-make. :-) Thanks _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnustep mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep _______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev _______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
_______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
