Am Mittwoch, den 01.04.2009, 11:27 +0100 schrieb David Chisnall: > On 1 Apr 2009, at 09:05, Fred Kiefer wrote: > > > This may sound strange, coming from my side as I already advocated the > > use of libffi when it still supported less platforms than ffcall, > > but I > > strongly advocate that we phase out support for ffcall very slowly. > > > > Remember that only two years ago somebody suggested that we should > > drop > > support for libffi :-) > > In that case, can someone add support for moving the return value > address off the stack to GSFFCallInvocation? At the moment, certain > uses of GSFFCallInvocation that work on Cocoa cause stack corruption > on GNUstep, as I mentioned in an earlier email.
Could I ask you for a bug report and/or a test case? It's stuff like this that we really need in our test suite. Cheers, David _______________________________________________ Gnustep-dev mailing list Gnustep-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnustep-dev
